Scenario-Based Messages on Social Media Motivate COVID-19 Information Seeking.

Communicating information about health risks empowers individuals to make informed decisions. To identify effective communication strategies, we manipulated the specificity, self-relevance, and emotional framing of messages designed to motivate information seeking about COVID-19 exposure risk. In Study 1 (N=221,829), we conducted a large-scale social media field study. Using Facebook advertisements, we targeted users by age and political attitudes. Episodic specificity drove engagement: Advertisements that contextualized risk in specific scenarios produced the highest click-through rates, across all demographic groups. In Study 2, we replicated and extended our findings in an online experiment (N=4,233). Message specificity (but not self-relevance or emotional valence) drove interest in learning about COVID-19 risks. Across both studies, we found that older adults and liberals were more interested in learning about COVID-19 risks. However, message specificity increased engagement across demographic groups. Overall, evoking specific scenarios motivated information seeking about COVID-19, facilitating risk communication to a broad audience.

Communicating COVID-19 exposure risk with an interactive website counteracts risk misestimation.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, individuals depended on risk information to make decisions about everyday behaviors and public policy. Here, we assessed whether an interactive website influenced individuals' risk tolerance to support public health goals. We collected data from 11,169 unique users who engaged with the online COVID-19 Event Risk Tool (https://covid19risk.biosci.gatech.edu/) between 9/22/21 and 1/22/22. The website featured interactive elements, including a dynamic risk map, survey questions, and a risk quiz with accuracy feedback. After learning about the risk of COVID-19 exposure, participants reported being less willing to participate in events that could spread COVID-19, especially for high-risk large events. We also uncovered a bias in risk estimation: Participants tended to overestimate the risk of small events but underestimate the risk of large events. Importantly, even participants who voluntarily sought information about COVID risks tended to misestimate exposure risk, demonstrating the need for intervention. Participants from liberal-leaning counties were more likely to use the website tools and more responsive to feedback about risk misestimation, indicating that political partisanship influences how individuals seek and engage with COVID-19 information. Lastly, we explored temporal dynamics and found that user engagement and risk estimation fluctuated over the course of the Omicron variant outbreak. Overall, we report an effective large-scale method for communicating viral exposure risk; our findings are relevant to broader research on risk communication, epidemiological modeling, and risky decision-making.

Altering the tuning parameter settings of a commercial powered prosthetic foot to increase power during push-off may not reduce collisional work in the intact limb during gait.

BACKGROUND: Increased knee osteoarthritis risk in patients with unilateral lower extremity limb loss is attributed to increased intact limb loading. Modulating powered ankle prosthesis push-off power may be an effective way to modulate intact limb loading. We examined how changes in the parameter settings of a commercial prosthetic ankle affect power delivery during push-off and the resulting collisional work experienced by the intact limb in persons with unilateral lower extremity limb loss. METHODS: Five subjects with unilateral transtibial amputation were fitted with a commercially available powered ankle prosthesis (Ottobock Empower). Subjects walked on a treadmill in seven conditions, where ankle power delivery settings were adjusted using methods accessible to clinicians. Kinetics and kinematics data were collected. RESULTS: Standard adjustment of parameter settings within the prosthetic foot did not alter timing of peak prosthesis power or intact limb collisional work but did have a significant effect on the magnitude of positive prosthesis ankle work. Increased prosthesis work did not decrease intact limb collisional work as predicted. CONCLUSIONS: Altering the parameter settings on a commercial powered ankle prosthesis affected the magnitude, but not the timing, of power delivered. Increased prosthesis push-off power did not decrease intact limb loading.